![]() ![]() Performance evaluation model of Romanian manufacturing listed companies by fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. Evaluation and ranking of solutions to mitigate sustainable remanufacturing supply chain risks: A hybrid fuzzy SWARA-fuzzy COPRAS framework approach. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(1), 294–301.Īndersen, P., & Petersen, N. On the choice of weights for aggregating judgments in non-negotiable AHP group decision making. Information Sciences, 507, 274–287.Īmenta, P., Lucadamo, A., & Marcarelli, G. On the transitivity and consistency approximated thresholds of some consistency indices for pairwise comparison matrices. ![]() Īmenta, P., Lucadamo, A., & Marcarelli, G. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(3), 533–548. ![]() A novel hybrid SWARA and VIKOR methodology for supplier selection in an agile environment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 126, 99–106.Īlimardani, M., Zolfani, S. Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(2), 576–583.Īhmadi, H. Reducing inconsistency measured by the geometric consistency index in the analytic hierarchy process. A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects. We show that (i) the hybrid methods proposed in this study require fewer expert judgments than AHP but deliver the same ranking, (ii) a higher degree of involvement in the hybrid voting AHP methods leads to higher acceptability of the results when experts are also the decision-makers, and (iii) experts are more motivated and attentive in methods requiring fewer pairwise comparisons and less interaction, resulting in a more efficient process and higher acceptability.Ībastante, F., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., & Lami, I. The proposed methods are described and evaluated systematically by implementing a widely used example in the AHP literature. We recap this evolution by introducing five new hybrid methods that combine AHP with popular weighting methods in MCDM. AHP revolutionized how we resolve complex decision problems and has evolved substantially over three decades. Despite the many benefits, the complications of the pairwise comparison process and the limitations of consistency in AHP are challenges that have been the subject of extensive research. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a reliable, rigorous, and robust method for eliciting and quantifying subjective judgments in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |